Re: [PATCH 08/11] KVM: MMU: use page track for non-leaf shadow pages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 12/16/2015 03:51 PM, Kai Huang wrote:


On 12/15/2015 05:10 PM, Xiao Guangrong wrote:


On 12/15/2015 03:52 PM, Kai Huang wrote:

  static bool __mmu_gfn_lpage_is_disallowed(gfn_t gfn, int level,
@@ -2140,12 +2150,18 @@ static struct kvm_mmu_page *kvm_mmu_get_page(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
      hlist_add_head(&sp->hash_link,
&vcpu->kvm->arch.mmu_page_hash[kvm_page_table_hashfn(gfn)]);
      if (!direct) {
-        if (rmap_write_protect(vcpu, gfn))
+        /*
+         * we should do write protection before syncing pages
+         * otherwise the content of the synced shadow page may
+         * be inconsistent with guest page table.
+         */
+        account_shadowed(vcpu->kvm, sp);
+
+        if (level == PT_PAGE_TABLE_LEVEL &&
+              rmap_write_protect(vcpu, gfn))
              kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(vcpu->kvm);
I think your modification is good but I am little bit confused here. In account_shadowed, if
sp->role.level > PT_PAGE_TABLE_LEVEL, the sp->gfn is write protected, and this is reasonable. So why
write protecting the gfn of PT_PAGE_TABLE_LEVEL here?

Because the shadow page will become 'sync' that means the shadow page will be synced
with the page table in guest. So the shadow page need to be write-protected to avoid
the guest page table is changed when we do the 'sync' thing.

The shadow page need to be write-protected to avoid that guest page table is changed
when we are syncing the shadow page table. See kvm_sync_pages() after doing
rmap_write_protect().
I see. So why are you treat PT_PAGE_TABLE_LEVEL gfn separately here? why this cannot be done in
account_shadowed, as you did for upper level sp?

non-leaf shadow pages are keepking write-protected which page fault handler can not fix write
access on it. And leaf shadow pages are not.

Actually I am thinking whether account_shadowed is
overdoing things. From it's name it should only *account* shadow sp, but now it also does write
protection and disable large page mapping.


Hmm.. disable large page mapping is already in current code... i think account_shadowed() can
be understood as new page is taken into account, so protection things are needed there.

But I am not good at naming function and also my english is not good enough, any other better name
is welcome. ;)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux