Re: [PATCH kvm-unit-tests 3/6] x86/pmu: expect failure with nmi_watchdog

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2015-12-14 16:05-0600, Andrew Jones:
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 10:24:18PM +0100, Radim Krčmář wrote:
>> diff --git a/x86/pmu.c b/x86/pmu.c
>> @@ -291,7 +292,7 @@ static void check_counters_many(void)
>>  		if (!verify_counter(&cnt[i]))
>>  			break;
>>  
>> -	report("all counters", i == n);
>> +	report_xfail("all counters", host_nmi_watchdog, i == n);
> 
> How about outputting "host_nmi_watchdog=%d" as well?

It's already implied in the output.  Prefix will be XPASS/XFAIL if
host_nmi_watchdog=1 and PASS/FAIL otherwise.

Should it still be explicitly printed?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux