On 12/2/2015 10:31 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>We hope
>to find a better way to make SRIOV NIC work in these cases and this is
>worth to do since SRIOV NIC provides better network performance compared
>with PV NIC.
If this is a performance optimization as the above implies,
you need to include some numbers, and document how did
you implement the switch and how did you measure the performance.
OK. Some ideas of my patches come from paper "CompSC: Live Migration with
Pass-through Devices".
http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/research/srg/netos/vee_2012/papers/p109.pdf
It compared performance data between the solution of switching PV and VF
and VF migration.(Chapter 7: Discussion)
>Current patches have some issues. I think we can find
>solution for them andimprove them step by step.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
