On Wed, 2015-12-02 at 18:41 +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > Hi Pavel, > > Thanks for getting to the bottom of this. > > On 1 December 2015 at 14:03, Pavel Fedin <p.fedin@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > This function takes stage-II physical addresses (A.K.A. IPA), on input, not > > real physical addresses. This causes kvm_is_device_pfn() to return wrong > > values, depending on how much guest and host memory maps match. This > > results in completely broken KVM on some boards. The problem has been > > caught on Samsung proprietary hardware. > > > > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Fixes: e6fab5442345 ("ARM/arm64: KVM: test properly for a PTE's uncachedness") > > > > That commit is not in a release yet, so no need for cc stable [...] But it is cc'd to stable, so unless it is going to be nacked at review stage, any subsequent fixes should also be cc'd. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings For every action, there is an equal and opposite criticism. - Harrison
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part