Sigh. Seems that my mail script got confused by the # after stable. So please strip down the cc list. On 11/19/2015 09:37 AM, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > From: David Hildenbrand <dahi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > For now, VCPUs were always created sequentially with incrementing > VCPU ids. Therefore, the index in the VCPUs array matched the id. > > As sequential creation might change with cpu hotplug, let's use > the correct lookup function to find a VCPU by id, not array index. > > Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx> > [split stable/non-stable parts] > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx # c3853a8: KVM: Provide function for VCPU lookup by id > --- > arch/s390/kvm/sigp.c | 8 ++------ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/sigp.c b/arch/s390/kvm/sigp.c > index da690b6..081dbd0 100644 > --- a/arch/s390/kvm/sigp.c > +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/sigp.c > @@ -291,12 +291,8 @@ static int handle_sigp_dst(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u8 order_code, > u16 cpu_addr, u32 parameter, u64 *status_reg) > { > int rc; > - struct kvm_vcpu *dst_vcpu; > + struct kvm_vcpu *dst_vcpu = kvm_lookup_vcpu(vcpu->kvm, cpu_addr); > > - if (cpu_addr >= KVM_MAX_VCPUS) > - return SIGP_CC_NOT_OPERATIONAL; > - > - dst_vcpu = kvm_get_vcpu(vcpu->kvm, cpu_addr); > if (!dst_vcpu) > return SIGP_CC_NOT_OPERATIONAL; > > @@ -478,7 +474,7 @@ int kvm_s390_handle_sigp_pei(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > trace_kvm_s390_handle_sigp_pei(vcpu, order_code, cpu_addr); > > if (order_code == SIGP_EXTERNAL_CALL) { > - dest_vcpu = kvm_get_vcpu(vcpu->kvm, cpu_addr); > + dest_vcpu = kvm_lookup_vcpu(vcpu->kvm, cpu_addr); > BUG_ON(dest_vcpu == NULL); > > kvm_s390_vcpu_wakeup(dest_vcpu); > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html