Re: [PATCH 09/10 RFC] KVM: x86: MMU: Move parent_pte handling from kvm_mmu_get_page() to link_shadow_page()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 11/12/2015 07:56 PM, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote:
Every time kvm_mmu_get_page() is called with a non-NULL parent_pte
argument, link_shadow_page() follows that to set the parent entry so
that the new mapping will point to the returned page table.

Moving parent_pte handling there allows to clean up the code because
parent_pte is passed to kvm_mmu_get_page() just for mark_unsync() and
mmu_page_add_parent_pte().

Signed-off-by: Takuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa_takuya_b1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c         | 21 ++++++++-------------
  arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h |  6 ++----
  2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
index 9273cd4..33fe720 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
@@ -2108,14 +2108,9 @@ static struct kvm_mmu_page *kvm_mmu_get_page(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
  		if (sp->unsync_children) {
  			kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_MMU_SYNC, vcpu);
  			kvm_mmu_mark_parents_unsync(sp);
-			if (parent_pte)
-				mark_unsync(parent_pte);
  		} else if (sp->unsync) {
  			kvm_mmu_mark_parents_unsync(sp);
-			if (parent_pte)
-				mark_unsync(parent_pte);
  		}
-		mmu_page_add_parent_pte(vcpu, sp, parent_pte);

  		__clear_sp_write_flooding_count(sp);
  		trace_kvm_mmu_get_page(sp, false);
@@ -2127,7 +2122,6 @@ static struct kvm_mmu_page *kvm_mmu_get_page(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
  	sp = kvm_mmu_alloc_page(vcpu, direct);

  	sp->parent_ptes.val = 0;
-	mmu_page_add_parent_pte(vcpu, sp, parent_pte);

  	sp->gfn = gfn;
  	sp->role = role;
@@ -2196,7 +2190,8 @@ static void shadow_walk_next(struct kvm_shadow_walk_iterator *iterator)
  	return __shadow_walk_next(iterator, *iterator->sptep);
  }

-static void link_shadow_page(u64 *sptep, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp, bool accessed)
+static void link_shadow_page(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *sptep,
+			     struct kvm_mmu_page *sp, bool accessed)
  {
  	u64 spte;

@@ -2210,6 +2205,11 @@ static void link_shadow_page(u64 *sptep, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp, bool accessed)
  		spte |= shadow_accessed_mask;

  	mmu_spte_set(sptep, spte);
+
+	if (sp->unsync_children || sp->unsync)
+		mark_unsync(sptep);

Why are these needed?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux