On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 10:18 AM, =?UTF-8?q?Radim=20Kr=C4=8Dm=C3=A1=C5=99?= <rkrcmar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > 2015-11-16 19:59+0200, Michael S. Tsirkin: >> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 06:51:06PM +0100, =?UTF-8?q?Radim=20Kr=C4=8Dm=C3=A1=C5=99?= wrote: >>> 2015-11-15 18:00+0200, Michael S. Tsirkin: >>> (And I think that eptp switching is expected to be used in conjuction >>> with #VE, so it'd then make sense to implement a nop for it as well.) >> >> No idea how would I even test it, so I'm not interested in #VE at this >> point. If you are - go ahead and post a patch for that on top though, >> why not. > > I thought that it's going to be simpler to provide functionality (that > utilizes eptp switching) to the guest through #VE, which probably isn't > true as I think more about it. (Not interested in implementing it :]) I'm willing to review a #VE stub. I'm not likely to implement it. --Andy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
