> So, IIUC. Once the qemu pieces are in place as well it shouldn't > change this behaviour: KVM will exit to qemu, qemu will log the error > information (new), then reinject the MC to the guest which can still > handle it as you describe above. Ah, that makes *much* more sense now! Thanks for the explanation: I don't really follow qemu development. > > But, there could be a problem if you have a new kernel with an old > qemu, in that case qemu might not understand the new exit type and > treat it as a fatal error, even though the guest could actually cope > with it. > > Aravinda, do we need to change this so that qemu has to explicitly > enable the new NMI behaviour? Or have I missed something that will > make that case work already. <puts on CAPI hat>Yeah, it would be good not to break this.</hat> Regards, Daniel > -- > David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code > david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_ > | _way_ _around_! > http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
