Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] target-i386/kvm: Hyper-V SynIC MSR's support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 11/11/2015 12:17 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:


On 11/11/2015 10:09, Andrey Smetanin wrote:

I would prefer to put this in kvm_arch_init_vcpu, if possible.

Ok. I think the kvm_arch_init_vcpu() is called after migration restores
cpu->env->msr_hv_synic_* values, so unconditional initialization of
cpu->env->msr_hv_synic_* values can overwrite migrated values. The check
"if (!env->msr_hv_synic_version) {" is neccessary for first time
initialization to protect against such overwriting. This is why this
code migrates 'msr_hv_synic_version' value.

No, kvm_arch_init_vcpu is called at the very beginning, when the VCPU
thread is created.

main
-> machine_class->init
-> pc_init1
-> pc_cpus_init
-> pc_new_cpu
-> cpu_x86_create
-> object_property_set_bool
-> x86_cpu_realizefn
-> qemu_init_vcpu
-> qemu_kvm_start_vcpu
-> qemu_kvm_cpu_thread_fn (in new thread)
-> kvm_init_vcpu
-> kvm_arch_init_vcpu

This is long before qemu_start_incoming_migration, which is among the
last things done before calling main_loop
In this case I'll remove migration of msr_hv_synic_version and make first time initialization inside kvm_arch_init_vcpu() - inside section where SynIC availability cpuid bit is set.

Thank you for clarification.

Paolo

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux