On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 12:44:54PM +0300, Pavel Fedin wrote: > Hello! > > > By this time i'll make a very minimal version of patch 0001, for you to test it. If we have > > problems with current 0001, which we > > cannot solve quickly, we could stick to that version then, which will provide the necessary > > changes to plug in LPIs, yet with > > minimal changes (it will only remove vgic_irq_lr_map). > > I guess i should have done it before. Or, i could even respin v5, with current 0001 split up. > > This should make it easier to bisect > > the problem. > > So, i have just sent v5, conditions are the same as before. It is OK to stop at any point, and actually you should be able to > easily throw away 0003 and apply just 1, 2, 4. The minimum needed thing for LPIs introduction is 0001. > You can also stick to v4 if the problem does not get triggered by its first patch, if you prefer reduced commit log. > Actually, I seem to have been just incredibly unlucky with my test cycles, because I eventually reproduced the bug without your patches. I'm going to take this version of the series because that's what I reviewed and tested. Sorry for the noise. -Christoffer -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
