Re: [PATCH net-next RFC 2/2] vhost_net: basic polling support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/22/2015 02:33 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 01:27:29AM -0400, Jason Wang wrote:
This patch tries to poll for new added tx buffer for a while at the
end of tx processing. The maximum time spent on polling were limited
through a module parameter. To avoid block rx, the loop will end it
there's new other works queued on vhost so in fact socket receive
queue is also be polled.

busyloop_timeout = 50 gives us following improvement on TCP_RR test:

size/session/+thu%/+normalize%
     1/     1/   +5%/  -20%
     1/    50/  +17%/   +3%

Is there a measureable increase in cpu utilization
with busyloop_timeout = 0?

And since a netperf TCP_RR test is involved, be careful about what netperf reports for CPU util if that increase isn't in the context of the guest OS.

For completeness, looking at the effect on TCP_STREAM and TCP_MAERTS, aggregate _RR and even aggregate _RR/packets per second for many VMs on the same system would be in order.

happy benchmarking,

rick jones

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux