On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 01:29:48PM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote: > > > On 10/12/2015 07:55 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > >On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 11:52:32AM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote: > >>Changelog in v3: > >>There is huge change in this version, thank Igor, Stefan, Paolo, Eduardo, > >>Michael for their valuable comments, the patchset finally gets better shape. > > > >Thanks! > >This needs some changes in coding style, and more comments, to > >make it easier to maintain going forward. > > Thanks for your review, Michael. I have learned lots of thing from > your comments. > > > > >High level comments - I didn't point out all instances, > >please go over code and locate them yourself. > >I focused on acpi code in this review. > > Okay, will do. > > > > > - fix coding style violations, prefix eveything with nvdimm_ etc > > Actually i did not pay attention on naming the stuff which is only internally > used. Thank you for pointing it out and will fix it in next version. > > > - in apci code, avoid manual memory management/complex pointer math > > I am not very good at ACPI ASL/AML, could you please more detail? It's about C. For example: Foo *foo = acpi_data_push(table, sizeof *foo); Bar *foo = acpi_data_push(table, sizeof *bar); is pretty obviously safe, and it doesn't require you to do any calculations. char *buf = acpi_data_push(table, sizeof *foo + sizeof *bar); is worse, now you need: Bar *bar = (Bar *)(buf + sizeof *foo); which will corrupt memory if you get the size wrong in push. > > - comments are needed to document apis & explain what's going on > > - constants need comments too, refer to text that > > can be looked up in acpi spec verbatim > > Indeed, will document carefully. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html