On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 5:51 AM, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On 10/10/2015 22:57, Dan Williams wrote: >> On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 1:35 PM, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On 10/10/2015 02:56, Dan Williams wrote: >>>> The core has developed a need for a "pfn_t" type [1]. Move the existing >>>> pfn_t in KVM to kvm_pfn_t [2]. >>>> >>>> [1]: https://lists.01.org/pipermail/linux-nvdimm/2015-September/002199.html >>>> [2]: https://lists.01.org/pipermail/linux-nvdimm/2015-September/002218.html >>> >>> Can you please change also the other types in include/linux/kvm_types.h? >> >> Hmm, all those seem kvm specific already. I'd only prefix them with >> kvm_ if they collided with a "core" type. > > But they are all related and the code becomes uglier if you only prefix > one of them. If you don't convert all of them, I will do it anyway as > soon as this patch get in. Ok. > Since it touches a lot of KVM files, we should synchronize in order to > avoid conflicts and gnashing of teeth. What tree is this patch going > in? You could provide me a commit SHA1 for this patch (well, its > definitive version) based on Linus's tree (so that I can merge it in my > tree as well), or I could commit it and provide the SHA1 to the > maintainer of said tree. The kvm_pfn_t conversion is only needed if the new pfn_t infrastructure moves forward, and at this point it still needs some review feedback. How about this, care to send conversion patches for the rest? ...based on: https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/djbw/nvdimm.git/log/?h=libnvdimm-pending When/if the new pfn_t bits move forward I'll carry them in the same pull request through the nvdimm.git tree. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
