RE: [PATCH v3 12/16] KVM: arm64: handle pending bit for LPIs in ITS emulation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



 Hello!

>  Shouldn't we also have 'break' here? If vgic_queue_irq() returns false, this means we have no
> more
> LRs to use, therefore it makes no sense to keep iterating.

 No, don't listen to me. :) Because of piggyback, we indeed have to recheck all the interrupts.

 P.S. I still sometimes lose LPIs, and this is not related to spurious injection fix, because i
tried to omit resetting irq_pending_on_cpu bit, and still lost some LPIs. Will try to compare with
v2, because with v2 i don't remember this problem.

Kind regards,
Pavel Fedin
Expert Engineer
Samsung Electronics Research center Russia


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux