On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 12:15:06PM +0100, Andre Przywara wrote: > Hi, > > On 08/10/15 11:56, Marc Zyngier wrote: > > On 08/10/15 11:14, Christoffer Dall wrote: > >> Hi Pavel, > >> > >> On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 05:44:27PM +0300, Pavel Fedin wrote: > >>> Current KVM code has lots of old redundancies, which can be cleaned up. > >>> This patchset is actually a better alternative to > >>> http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg430726.html, which allows to > >>> keep piggy-backed LRs. The idea is based on the fact that our code also > >>> maintains LR state in elrsr, and this information is enough to track LR > >>> usage. > >>> > >>> This patchset is made against linux-next of 02.10.2015. Thanks to Andre > >>> for pointing out some 4.3 specifics. > >>> > >> I'm not opposed to these changes, they clean up the data structures > >> which is definitely a good thing. > >> > >> I am a bit worries about how/if this is going to conflict with the ITS > >> series and other patches in flight touchignt he vgic. > >> > >> Marc/Andre, any thoughts on this? > > > > I don't mind the simplification (Andre was already removing the > > piggybacking stuff as part of his ITS series). I'm a bit more cautious > > about the sync_elrsr stuff, but that's mostly because I've only read the > > patch in a superficial way. > > > > But yes, this is probably going to clash, unless we make this part of an > > existing series (/me looks at André... ;-) > > Yes, I am looking at merging this. From the discussion with Pavel I > remember some things that I disagreed with, so I may propose a follow-up > patch. I will give this a try tomorrow. > >From a maintainer perspective I'd much prefer Andre take these patches as part of his series and send everything together in one go. Thanks, -Christoffer -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
