Hi Eric,
thanks a lot for your comments. I just found this email, which seemed to
have been crushed between my holidays and KVM forum.
I tried to address your concerns in my new revision, some have become
obsolete due to the reworked locking.
So I refrain from answering in detail here, since some code has changed
in v3 and I don't really want to talk about the old version anymore ;-)
If you care I can try to answer on your concerns in the new v3 context,
but you may want to take a look at the new patch anyway.
Cheers,
Andre.
On 17/08/15 14:33, Eric Auger wrote:
> On 07/10/2015 04:21 PM, Andre Przywara wrote:
>> The connection between a device, an event ID, the LPI number and the
>> allocated CPU is stored in in-memory tables in a GICv3, but their
>> format is not specified by the spec. Instead software uses a command
>> queue in a ring buffer to let the ITS implementation use their own
>> format.
>> Implement handlers for the various ITS commands and let them store
>> the requested relation into our own data structures.
>> To avoid kmallocs inside the ITS spinlock, we preallocate possibly
>> needed memory outside of the lock and free that if it turns out to
>> be not needed (mostly error handling).
> still dist lock ...?
>> Error handling is very basic at this point, as we don't have a good
>> way of communicating errors to the guest (usually a SError).
>> The INT command handler is missing at this point, as we gain the
>> capability of actually injecting MSIs into the guest only later on.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@xxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h | 5 +-
>> virt/kvm/arm/its-emul.c | 497 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>> virt/kvm/arm/its-emul.h | 11 +
>> 3 files changed, 511 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h b/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h
>> index 0b450c7..80db4f6 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h
>> @@ -253,7 +253,10 @@
>> */
>> #define GITS_CMD_MAPD 0x08
>> #define GITS_CMD_MAPC 0x09
>> -#define GITS_CMD_MAPVI 0x0a
>> +#define GITS_CMD_MAPTI 0x0a
>> +/* older GIC documentation used MAPVI for this command */
>> +#define GITS_CMD_MAPVI GITS_CMD_MAPTI
>> +#define GITS_CMD_MAPI 0x0b
>> #define GITS_CMD_MOVI 0x01
>> #define GITS_CMD_DISCARD 0x0f
>> #define GITS_CMD_INV 0x0c
>> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/its-emul.c b/virt/kvm/arm/its-emul.c
>> index 05245cb..89534c6 100644
>> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/its-emul.c
>> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/its-emul.c
>> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
>> #include <linux/kvm_host.h>
>> #include <linux/interrupt.h>
>> #include <linux/list.h>
>> +#include <linux/slab.h>
>>
>> #include <linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h>
>> #include <kvm/arm_vgic.h>
>> @@ -55,6 +56,34 @@ struct its_itte {
>> unsigned long *pending;
>> };
>>
>> +static struct its_device *find_its_device(struct kvm *kvm, u32 device_id)
>> +{
>> + struct vgic_its *its = &kvm->arch.vgic.its;
>> + struct its_device *device;
>> +
>> + list_for_each_entry(device, &its->device_list, dev_list)
>> + if (device_id == device->device_id)
>> + return device;
>> +
>> + return NULL;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static struct its_itte *find_itte(struct kvm *kvm, u32 device_id, u32 event_id)
>> +{
>> + struct its_device *device;
>> + struct its_itte *itte;
>> +
>> + device = find_its_device(kvm, device_id);
>> + if (device == NULL)
>> + return NULL;
>> +
>> + list_for_each_entry(itte, &device->itt, itte_list)
>> + if (itte->event_id == event_id)
>> + return itte;
>> +
>> + return NULL;
>> +}
>> +
>> #define for_each_lpi(dev, itte, kvm) \
>> list_for_each_entry(dev, &(kvm)->arch.vgic.its.device_list, dev_list) \
>> list_for_each_entry(itte, &(dev)->itt, itte_list)
>> @@ -71,6 +100,19 @@ static struct its_itte *find_itte_by_lpi(struct kvm *kvm, int lpi)
>> return NULL;
>> }
>>
>> +static struct its_collection *find_collection(struct kvm *kvm, int coll_id)
>> +{
>> + struct its_collection *collection;
>> +
>> + list_for_each_entry(collection, &kvm->arch.vgic.its.collection_list,
>> + coll_list) {
>> + if (coll_id == collection->collection_id)
>> + return collection;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return NULL;
>> +}
>> +
>> #define LPI_PROP_ENABLE_BIT(p) ((p) & LPI_PROP_ENABLED)
>> #define LPI_PROP_PRIORITY(p) ((p) & 0xfc)
>>
>> @@ -333,9 +375,461 @@ void vits_unqueue_lpi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int lpi)
>> spin_unlock(&its->lock);
>> }
>>
>> +static u64 its_cmd_mask_field(u64 *its_cmd, int word, int shift, int size)
>> +{
>> + return (le64_to_cpu(its_cmd[word]) >> shift) & (BIT_ULL(size) - 1);
>> +}
>> +
>> +#define its_cmd_get_command(cmd) its_cmd_mask_field(cmd, 0, 0, 8)
>> +#define its_cmd_get_deviceid(cmd) its_cmd_mask_field(cmd, 0, 32, 32)
>> +#define its_cmd_get_id(cmd) its_cmd_mask_field(cmd, 1, 0, 32)
>> +#define its_cmd_get_physical_id(cmd) its_cmd_mask_field(cmd, 1, 32, 32)
>> +#define its_cmd_get_collection(cmd) its_cmd_mask_field(cmd, 2, 0, 16)
>> +#define its_cmd_get_target_addr(cmd) its_cmd_mask_field(cmd, 2, 16, 32)
>> +#define its_cmd_get_validbit(cmd) its_cmd_mask_field(cmd, 2, 63, 1)
>> +
>> +/* The DISCARD command frees an Interrupt Translation Table Entry (ITTE). */
>> +static int vits_cmd_handle_discard(struct kvm *kvm, u64 *its_cmd)
>> +{
>> + struct vgic_its *its = &kvm->arch.vgic.its;
>> + u32 device_id;
>> + u32 event_id;
>> + struct its_itte *itte;
>> + int ret = 0;
>> +
>> + device_id = its_cmd_get_deviceid(its_cmd);
>> + event_id = its_cmd_get_id(its_cmd);
>> +
>> + spin_lock(&its->lock);
>> + itte = find_itte(kvm, device_id, event_id);
>> + if (!itte || !itte->collection) {
>> + ret = E_ITS_DISCARD_UNMAPPED_INTERRUPT;
>> + goto out_unlock;
>> + }
>> +
>> + __clear_bit(itte->collection->target_addr, itte->pending);
> no use since the itte is deleted afterwards?
>> +
>> + list_del(&itte->itte_list);
> However what about the deletion of the pending field? May be worth
> introducing a function to delete an itte (called several times)
>> + kfree(itte);
>> +out_unlock:
>> + spin_unlock(&its->lock);
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* The MOVI command moves an ITTE to a different collection. */
>> +static int vits_cmd_handle_movi(struct kvm *kvm, u64 *its_cmd)
>> +{
>> + struct vgic_its *its = &kvm->arch.vgic.its;
>> + u32 device_id = its_cmd_get_deviceid(its_cmd);
>> + u32 event_id = its_cmd_get_id(its_cmd);
>> + u32 coll_id = its_cmd_get_collection(its_cmd);
>> + struct its_itte *itte;
>> + struct its_collection *collection;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + spin_lock(&its->lock);
>> + itte = find_itte(kvm, device_id, event_id);
>> + if (!itte) {
>> + ret = E_ITS_MOVI_UNMAPPED_INTERRUPT;
>> + goto out_unlock;
>> + }
>> + if (!itte->collection) {
>> + ret = E_ITS_MOVI_UNMAPPED_COLLECTION;
>> + goto out_unlock;
>> + }
>> +
>> + collection = find_collection(kvm, coll_id);
>> + if (!collection) {
>> + ret = E_ITS_MOVI_UNMAPPED_COLLECTION;
>> + goto out_unlock;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (test_and_clear_bit(itte->collection->target_addr, itte->pending))
>> + __set_bit(collection->target_addr, itte->pending);
> Don't you think we should make sure target_addr is property set on both
> source & destination collection (MAPC with valid bit). Typically the
> user could MAPI and then call this. This would encourage to add a valid
> bit in the collection struct to tell the target_addr is set.
>> +
>> + itte->collection = collection;
>> +out_unlock:
>> + spin_unlock(&its->lock);
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void vits_init_collection(struct kvm *kvm,
>> + struct its_collection *collection,
>> + u32 coll_id)
>> +{
>> + collection->collection_id = coll_id;
>> +
>> + list_add_tail(&collection->coll_list,
>> + &kvm->arch.vgic.its.collection_list);
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* The MAPTI and MAPI commands map LPIs to ITTEs. */
>> +static int vits_cmd_handle_mapi(struct kvm *kvm, u64 *its_cmd, u8 cmd)
>> +{
>> + struct vgic_dist *dist = &kvm->arch.vgic;
>> + u32 device_id = its_cmd_get_deviceid(its_cmd);
>> + u32 event_id = its_cmd_get_id(its_cmd);
>> + u32 coll_id = its_cmd_get_collection(its_cmd);
>> + struct its_itte *itte, *new_itte;
>> + struct its_device *device;
>> + struct its_collection *collection, *new_coll;
>> + int lpi_nr;
>> + int ret = 0;
>> +
>> + /* Preallocate possibly needed memory here outside of the lock */
>> + new_coll = kmalloc(sizeof(struct its_collection), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + new_itte = kzalloc(sizeof(struct its_itte), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (new_itte)
>> + new_itte->pending = kcalloc(BITS_TO_LONGS(dist->nr_cpus),
>> + sizeof(long), GFP_KERNEL);
>> +
>> + spin_lock(&dist->its.lock);
>> +
>> + device = find_its_device(kvm, device_id);
>> + if (!device) {
>> + ret = E_ITS_MAPTI_UNMAPPED_DEVICE;
>> + goto out_unlock;
>> + }
>> +
>> + collection = find_collection(kvm, coll_id);
>> + if (!collection && !new_coll) {
>> + ret = -ENOMEM;
>> + goto out_unlock;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (cmd == GITS_CMD_MAPTI)
>> + lpi_nr = its_cmd_get_physical_id(its_cmd);
>> + else
>> + lpi_nr = event_id;
>> + if (lpi_nr < GIC_LPI_OFFSET ||
>> + lpi_nr >= nr_idbits_propbase(dist->propbaser)) {
>> + ret = E_ITS_MAPTI_PHYSICALID_OOR;
>> + goto out_unlock;
>> + }
>> +
>> + itte = find_itte(kvm, device_id, event_id);
>> + if (!itte) {
>> + if (!new_itte || !new_itte->pending) {
>> + ret = -ENOMEM;
>> + goto out_unlock;
>> + }
>> + itte = new_itte;
>> +
>> + itte->event_id = event_id;
>> + list_add_tail(&itte->itte_list, &device->itt);
>> + } else {
>> + if (new_itte)
>> + kfree(new_itte->pending);
>> + kfree(new_itte);
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (!collection) {
>> + collection = new_coll;
> need to handle the case where new_coll is null which would cause a crash
> in init_collection
>> + vits_init_collection(kvm, collection, coll_id);
>> + } else {
>> + kfree(new_coll);
>> + }
>> +
>> + itte->collection = collection;
>> + itte->lpi = lpi_nr;
>> +
>> +out_unlock:
>> + spin_unlock(&dist->its.lock);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + kfree(new_coll);
>> + if (new_itte)
>> + kfree(new_itte->pending);
>> + kfree(new_itte);
>> + }
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void vits_unmap_device(struct kvm *kvm, struct its_device *device)
>> +{
>> + struct its_itte *itte, *temp;
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * The spec says that unmapping a device with still valid
>> + * ITTEs associated is UNPREDICTABLE. We remove all ITTEs,
>> + * since we cannot leave the memory unreferenced.
>> + */
>> + list_for_each_entry_safe(itte, temp, &device->itt, itte_list) {
>> + list_del(&itte->itte_list);
> deletion of itte->pending
>> + kfree(itte);
>> + }
>> +
>> + list_del(&device->dev_list);
>> + kfree(device);
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* The MAPD command maps device IDs to Interrupt Translation Tables (ITTs). */
> or unmaps
>> +static int vits_cmd_handle_mapd(struct kvm *kvm, u64 *its_cmd)
>> +{
>> + struct vgic_its *its = &kvm->arch.vgic.its;
>> + bool valid = its_cmd_get_validbit(its_cmd);
>> + u32 device_id = its_cmd_get_deviceid(its_cmd);
>> + struct its_device *device, *new_device = NULL;
>> +
>> + /* We preallocate memory outside of the lock here */
>> + if (valid) {
>> + new_device = kzalloc(sizeof(struct its_device), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!new_device)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> + }
>> +
>> + spin_lock(&its->lock);
>> +
>> + device = find_its_device(kvm, device_id);
>> + if (device)
> logically valid should be false too else that's an error?
>> + vits_unmap_device(kvm, device);
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * The spec does not say whether unmapping a not-mapped device
>> + * is an error, so we are done in any case.
>> + */
>> + if (!valid)
>> + goto out_unlock;
>> +
>> + device = new_device;
>> +
>> + device->device_id = device_id;
>> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&device->itt);
>> +
>> + list_add_tail(&device->dev_list,
>> + &kvm->arch.vgic.its.device_list);
>> +
>> +out_unlock:
>> + spin_unlock(&its->lock);
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* The MAPC command maps collection IDs to redistributors. */
>> +static int vits_cmd_handle_mapc(struct kvm *kvm, u64 *its_cmd)
>> +{
>> + struct vgic_its *its = &kvm->arch.vgic.its;
>> + u16 coll_id;
>> + u32 target_addr;
>> + struct its_collection *collection, *new_coll = NULL;
>> + bool valid;
>> +
>> + valid = its_cmd_get_validbit(its_cmd);
>> + coll_id = its_cmd_get_collection(its_cmd);
>> + target_addr = its_cmd_get_target_addr(its_cmd);
>> +
>> + if (target_addr >= atomic_read(&kvm->online_vcpus))
>> + return E_ITS_MAPC_PROCNUM_OOR;
>> +
>> + /* We preallocate memory outside of the lock here */
>> + if (valid) {
>> + new_coll = kmalloc(sizeof(struct its_collection), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!new_coll)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> + }
>> +
>> + spin_lock(&its->lock);
>> + collection = find_collection(kvm, coll_id);
>> +
>> + if (!valid) {
>> + struct its_device *device;
>> + struct its_itte *itte;
>> + /*
>> + * Clearing the mapping for that collection ID removes the
>> + * entry from the list. If there wasn't any before, we can
>> + * go home early.
>> + */
>> + if (!collection)
>> + goto out_unlock;
>> +
>> + for_each_lpi(device, itte, kvm)
>> + if (itte->collection &&
>> + itte->collection->collection_id == coll_id)
>> + itte->collection = NULL;
>> +
>> + list_del(&collection->coll_list);
>> + kfree(collection);
>> + } else {
>> + if (!collection)
>> + collection = new_coll;
>> + else
>> + kfree(new_coll);
>> +
>> + vits_init_collection(kvm, collection, coll_id);
>> + collection->target_addr = target_addr;
>> + }
>> +
>> +out_unlock:
>> + spin_unlock(&its->lock);
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* The CLEAR command removes the pending state for a particular LPI. */
>> +static int vits_cmd_handle_clear(struct kvm *kvm, u64 *its_cmd)
>> +{
>> + struct vgic_its *its = &kvm->arch.vgic.its;
>> + u32 device_id;
>> + u32 event_id;
>> + struct its_itte *itte;
>> + int ret = 0;
>> +
>> + device_id = its_cmd_get_deviceid(its_cmd);
>> + event_id = its_cmd_get_id(its_cmd);
>> +
>> + spin_lock(&its->lock);
>> +
>> + itte = find_itte(kvm, device_id, event_id);
>> + if (!itte) {
>> + ret = E_ITS_CLEAR_UNMAPPED_INTERRUPT;
>> + goto out_unlock;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (itte->collection)
>> + __clear_bit(itte->collection->target_addr, itte->pending);
>> +
>> +out_unlock:
>> + spin_unlock(&its->lock);
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* The INV command syncs the pending bit from the memory tables. */
>> +static int vits_cmd_handle_inv(struct kvm *kvm, u64 *its_cmd)
>> +{
>> + struct vgic_dist *dist = &kvm->arch.vgic;
>> + u32 device_id;
>> + u32 event_id;
>> + struct its_itte *itte, *new_itte;
>> + gpa_t propbase;
>> + int ret;
>> + u8 prop;
>> +
>> + device_id = its_cmd_get_deviceid(its_cmd);
>> + event_id = its_cmd_get_id(its_cmd);
>> +
>> + spin_lock(&dist->its.lock);
>> + itte = find_itte(kvm, device_id, event_id);
>> + spin_unlock(&dist->its.lock);
>> + if (!itte)
>> + return E_ITS_INV_UNMAPPED_INTERRUPT;
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * We cannot read from guest memory inside the spinlock, so we
>> + * need to re-read our tables to learn whether the LPI number we are
>> + * using is still valid.
>> + */
>> + do {
>> + propbase = BASER_BASE_ADDRESS(dist->propbaser);
>> + ret = kvm_read_guest(kvm, propbase + itte->lpi - GIC_LPI_OFFSET,
>> + &prop, 1);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + spin_lock(&dist->its.lock);
>> + new_itte = find_itte(kvm, device_id, event_id);
>> + if (new_itte->lpi != itte->lpi) {
>> + itte = new_itte;
>> + spin_unlock(&dist->its.lock);
>> + continue;
>> + }
>> + update_lpi_config(kvm, itte, prop);
> spec says the pending table should be sync'ed too. shouldn't we update
> the pending table in the guest address range?
>> + spin_unlock(&dist->its.lock);
>> + } while (0);
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* The INVALL command requests flushing of all IRQ data in this collection. */
>> +static int vits_cmd_handle_invall(struct kvm *kvm, u64 *its_cmd)
>> +{
>> + u32 coll_id = its_cmd_get_collection(its_cmd);
>> + struct its_collection *collection;
>> + struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
>> +
>> + collection = find_collection(kvm, coll_id);
>> + if (!collection)
>> + return E_ITS_INVALL_UNMAPPED_COLLECTION;
>> +
>> + vcpu = kvm_get_vcpu(kvm, collection->target_addr);
>> +
>> + its_update_lpis_configuration(kvm);
>> + its_sync_lpi_pending_table(vcpu);
> here we do?
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* The MOVALL command moves all IRQs from one redistributor to another. */
>> +static int vits_cmd_handle_movall(struct kvm *kvm, u64 *its_cmd)
>> +{
>> + struct vgic_its *its = &kvm->arch.vgic.its;
>> + u32 target1_addr = its_cmd_get_target_addr(its_cmd);
>> + u32 target2_addr = its_cmd_mask_field(its_cmd, 3, 16, 32);
>> + struct its_collection *collection;
>> + struct its_device *device;
>> + struct its_itte *itte;
>> +
>> + if (target1_addr >= atomic_read(&kvm->online_vcpus) ||
>> + target2_addr >= atomic_read(&kvm->online_vcpus))
>> + return E_ITS_MOVALL_PROCNUM_OOR;
>> +
>> + if (target1_addr == target2_addr)
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> + spin_lock(&its->lock);
>> + for_each_lpi(device, itte, kvm) {
>> + /* remap all collections mapped to target address 1 */
>> + collection = itte->collection;
>> + if (collection && collection->target_addr == target1_addr)
>> + collection->target_addr = target2_addr;
>> +
>> + /* move pending state if LPI is affected */
>> + if (test_and_clear_bit(target1_addr, itte->pending))
>> + __set_bit(target2_addr, itte->pending);
>> + }
>> +
>> + spin_unlock(&its->lock);
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> static int vits_handle_command(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *its_cmd)
>> {
>> - return -ENODEV;
>> + u8 cmd = its_cmd_get_command(its_cmd);
>> + int ret = -ENODEV;
>> +
>> + switch (cmd) {
>> + case GITS_CMD_MAPD:
>> + ret = vits_cmd_handle_mapd(vcpu->kvm, its_cmd);
>> + break;
>> + case GITS_CMD_MAPC:
>> + ret = vits_cmd_handle_mapc(vcpu->kvm, its_cmd);
>> + break;
>> + case GITS_CMD_MAPI:
>> + ret = vits_cmd_handle_mapi(vcpu->kvm, its_cmd, cmd);
>> + break;
>> + case GITS_CMD_MAPTI:
>> + ret = vits_cmd_handle_mapi(vcpu->kvm, its_cmd, cmd);
>> + break;
>> + case GITS_CMD_MOVI:
>> + ret = vits_cmd_handle_movi(vcpu->kvm, its_cmd);
>> + break;
>> + case GITS_CMD_DISCARD:
>> + ret = vits_cmd_handle_discard(vcpu->kvm, its_cmd);
>> + break;
>> + case GITS_CMD_CLEAR:
>> + ret = vits_cmd_handle_clear(vcpu->kvm, its_cmd);
>> + break;
>> + case GITS_CMD_MOVALL:
>> + ret = vits_cmd_handle_movall(vcpu->kvm, its_cmd);
>> + break;
>> + case GITS_CMD_INV:
>> + ret = vits_cmd_handle_inv(vcpu->kvm, its_cmd);
>> + break;
>> + case GITS_CMD_INVALL:
>> + ret = vits_cmd_handle_invall(vcpu->kvm, its_cmd);
>> + break;
>> + case GITS_CMD_SYNC:
>> + /* we ignore this command: we are in sync all of the time */
>> + ret = 0;
>> + break;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> }
>>
>> static bool handle_mmio_gits_cbaser(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>> @@ -554,6 +1048,7 @@ void vits_destroy(struct kvm *kvm)
>> list_for_each_safe(cur, temp, &dev->itt) {
>> itte = (container_of(cur, struct its_itte, itte_list));
>> list_del(cur);
>> + kfree(itte->pending);
> should belong to a previous patch I think
>
> Eric
>> kfree(itte);
>> }
>> list_del(dev_cur);
>> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/its-emul.h b/virt/kvm/arm/its-emul.h
>> index cbc3877..830524a 100644
>> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/its-emul.h
>> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/its-emul.h
>> @@ -39,4 +39,15 @@ void vits_destroy(struct kvm *kvm);
>> bool vits_queue_lpis(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>> void vits_unqueue_lpi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int irq);
>>
>> +#define E_ITS_MOVI_UNMAPPED_INTERRUPT 0x010107
>> +#define E_ITS_MOVI_UNMAPPED_COLLECTION 0x010109
>> +#define E_ITS_CLEAR_UNMAPPED_INTERRUPT 0x010507
>> +#define E_ITS_MAPC_PROCNUM_OOR 0x010902
>> +#define E_ITS_MAPTI_UNMAPPED_DEVICE 0x010a04
>> +#define E_ITS_MAPTI_PHYSICALID_OOR 0x010a06
>> +#define E_ITS_INV_UNMAPPED_INTERRUPT 0x010c07
>> +#define E_ITS_INVALL_UNMAPPED_COLLECTION 0x010d09
>> +#define E_ITS_MOVALL_PROCNUM_OOR 0x010e01
>> +#define E_ITS_DISCARD_UNMAPPED_INTERRUPT 0x010f07
>> +
>> #endif
>>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
