On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 04:34:01PM -0700, Mario Smarduch wrote: > This is a 2nd itteration for arm64, v1 patches were posted by mistake from an > older branch which included several bugs. Hopefully didn't waste too much of > anyones time. > > This patch series is a followup to the armv7 fp/simd lazy switch > implementation, uses similar approach and depends on the series - see > https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/pipermail/kvmarm/2015-September/016516.html > > It's based on earlier arm64 fp/simd optimization work - see > https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/pipermail/kvmarm/2015-July/015748.html > > And subsequent fixes by Marc and Christoffer at KVM Forum hackathon to handle > 32-bit guest on 64 bit host (and may require more here) - see > https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/pipermail/kvmarm/2015-August/016128.html > > This series has be tested with arm64 on arm64 with several FP applications > running on host and guest, with substantial decrease on number of > fp/simd context switches. From about 30% down to 2% with one guest running. > > At this time I don't have arm32/arm64 working and hoping Christoffer and/or > Marc (or anyone) can test 32-bit guest/64-bit host. > Did you already have some test infrastructure/applications that I can reuse for this purpose or do I have to write userspace software? -Christoffer -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
