Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On 24/09/2015 17:45, Bandan Das wrote: >> > However, I have applied the patch to kvm/queue. Please send the changes >> > separately, and I will squash them in the existing VPID patch. >> >> Please don't do this. It's making it really difficult to review these >> patches individually :( Why not let them get some review time before >> applying them all together ? > > Ok---I did it because it makes sense to keep this patch separate from > the others. You can expose VPID even if vpid02 == vpid01 (in fact > that's what happens if KVM cannot find a vpid02) and in that case this > patch provides a valid implementation of INVVPID. > > Do you think it would help if I posted the whole kvm/queue contents a > few days before pushing it to kvm/next? Oh that would be great. Thank you! > Paolo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
