Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] KVM: nVMX: enhance allocate/free_vpid to handle shadow vpid

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 9/16/15 2:42 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2015-09-16 05:51, Wanpeng Li wrote:
Enhance allocate/free_vid to handle shadow vpid.

Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 24 +++++++++++-------------
  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
index 9ff6a3f..4956081 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
@@ -4155,29 +4155,27 @@ static int alloc_identity_pagetable(struct kvm *kvm)
  	return r;
  }
-static void allocate_vpid(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx)
+static int allocate_vpid(void)
  {
-	int vpid;
+	int vpid = 0;
Initialization is not pointless with the current code.

- vmx->vpid = 0;
  	if (!enable_vpid)
-		return;
+		return 0;
  	spin_lock(&vmx_vpid_lock);
  	vpid = find_first_zero_bit(vmx_vpid_bitmap, VMX_NR_VPIDS);
-	if (vpid < VMX_NR_VPIDS) {
-		vmx->vpid = vpid;
+	if (vpid < VMX_NR_VPIDS)
  		__set_bit(vpid, vmx_vpid_bitmap);
-	}
  	spin_unlock(&vmx_vpid_lock);
+	return vpid;
You should return 0 also if vpid == VMX_NR_VPIDS.

Agreed.


  }
-static void free_vpid(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx)
+static void free_vpid(int vpid)
  {
  	if (!enable_vpid)
You could already test for vpid == 0 here...

  		return;
  	spin_lock(&vmx_vpid_lock);
-	if (vmx->vpid != 0)
-		__clear_bit(vmx->vpid, vmx_vpid_bitmap);
+	if (vpid != 0)
...then you could skip this.

Agreed.


+		__clear_bit(vpid, vmx_vpid_bitmap);
  	spin_unlock(&vmx_vpid_lock);
  }
@@ -8482,7 +8480,7 @@ static void vmx_free_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) if (enable_pml)
  		vmx_disable_pml(vmx);
-	free_vpid(vmx);
+	free_vpid(vmx->vpid);
  	leave_guest_mode(vcpu);
  	vmx_load_vmcs01(vcpu);
  	free_nested(vmx);
@@ -8501,7 +8499,7 @@ static struct kvm_vcpu *vmx_create_vcpu(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned int id)
  	if (!vmx)
  		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
- allocate_vpid(vmx);
+	vmx->vpid = allocate_vpid();
err = kvm_vcpu_init(&vmx->vcpu, kvm, id);
  	if (err)
@@ -8577,7 +8575,7 @@ free_msrs:
  uninit_vcpu:
  	kvm_vcpu_uninit(&vmx->vcpu);
  free_vcpu:
-	free_vpid(vmx);
+	free_vpid(vmx->vpid);
  	kmem_cache_free(kvm_vcpu_cache, vmx);
  	return ERR_PTR(err);
  }

Yes, this is what I had in mind.

Thanks for your review. :-)

Regards,
Wanpeng Li
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux