On 02/09/2015 12:31, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > As far as I can see this should also work for s390 (when we implement > REQ_EXIT handling) > > To double check my understanding: these improvements come with a changed > userspace that does not use KVM_SET_SIGNAL_MASK and therefore this > conditional is false > if (vcpu->sigset_active) > sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, &vcpu->sigset, &sigsaved); > Correct? > > That also means we improve exits that go to userspace but lightweight exits > that stay inside the kernel are not affected. Yes, both observations are correct. Paolo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
