On 09/02/2015 06:06 PM, Igor Mammedov wrote:
On Fri, 14 Aug 2015 22:51:55 +0800 Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Only 512M is left for MMIO below 4G and that are used by PCI, BIOS etc. Other components also reserve regions from their internal usage, e.g, [0xFED00000, 0xFED00000 + 0x400) is reserved for HPET Switch SSDT to 64 bit to use the huge free room above 4G. In the later patches, we will dynamical allocate free space within this region which is used by NVDIMM _DSM method Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- hw/i386/acpi-build.c | 4 ++-- hw/i386/acpi-dsdt.dsl | 2 +- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c index 46eddb8..8ead1c1 100644 --- a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c +++ b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c @@ -1348,7 +1348,7 @@ build_ssdt(GArray *table_data, GArray *linker, g_array_append_vals(table_data, ssdt->buf->data, ssdt->buf->len); build_header(linker, table_data, (void *)(table_data->data + table_data->len - ssdt->buf->len), - "SSDT", ssdt->buf->len, 1); + "SSDT", ssdt->buf->len, 2);That might break Windows XP, since it supports only 1.0b ACPI with some 2.0 extensions. there is 2 way to work around it: - add an additional Rev2 ssdt table if NVDIMMs are present and describe them there
I like this way, it's more straightforward to me. BTW, IIUC the DSDT still need to be changed to Rev2 to recognise SSDT with Rev2, does it hurt Windows XP? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
