Re: [RFC/PATCH 2/3] x86/signal/64: Try to preserve hardware SS across 64-bit signal delivery

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 2:26 PM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> VERW is no good, because it considers non-present segments to be
> writable.  Test cases for the win!

Seriously? That's crazy. I don't think I've actually ever used VERW,
but the documentation certainly says that the segment has to be
writable, and I quote

  "The validation performed is the same as is performed when a segment
selector is loaded into the DS, ES, FS, or GS register, and the
indicated access (read or write) is performed"

which damn well shouldn't work for non-present segments. Odd.

                  Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux