On 06/08/2015 10:06, Marc Zyngier wrote: > > If this structure of function pointers can handle function pointers with a return type of > > void I will be glad to do what you request otherwise this would require a major rewrite > > of kvm arm subsystem for a very simple bug fix. > > Just like Paolo said, the error you report should never happen, and > would be caught by a WARN_ON() the first time anyone boots the kernel. > Also, failing to register the device ops results in not being able to > instantiate a VGIC. No harm done. I really don't understand why you want > to rewrite the probe functions. I think he just misunderstood my suggestion. I didn't suggest making the probe functions return void. I suggested that kvm_register_device_ops return void. Paolo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
