Shih-Wei Li <shihwei@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Shih-Wei Li <shihwei@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 2:30 PM, Christoffer Dall <cdall@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Hi Shih-Wei,
>>>
>>> [Something weird happened when sending these e-mails, you sent two where
>>> one seems to be a slight modification of the other?]
>>
>> yes, the previous one just got rejected by the mailing list. sorry
>> about the spam.
>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 02:18:23PM -0400, Shih-Wei Li wrote:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> This is Shih-Wei, I'm Christoffer's colleague at Columbia University.
>>>> We have experienced some problems in running kvm-unit-tests in our
>>>> environment.
>>>> Here's what we did:
>>>> ./configure
>>>> make
>>>> ./run_test.sh
>>>>
>>>> run_test.sh halted in some specific test items and couldn't finish the
>>>> run. I managed to get it finish running after removing the following
>>>> items:
>>>> x86/apic.c:
>>>> -> removed:
>>>> test_sti_nmi();
>>>> test_multiple_nmi();
>>>
>>> I'm wondering if there's a dependency on the version of QEMU? Have you
>>> tried with the most recent upstream QEMU?
>>
>> I haven't, but I will try. We are using qemu 2.2.50 now.
>
> Here's the update. I just used the upstream QEMU to run kvm-unit-test,
> but it still failed to finish the same test items I mentioned earlier.
(Just a cursory look) It seems this commit introduced it -
commit 402d4596789335f540a0697955f6dcf43e2bb796
Author: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu Jul 23 09:16:45 2015 +0200
x86: load 64-bit segments into the segment registers
kvm-unit-tests was keeping DS/ES/FS/GS loaded with the segment descriptors
provided by the multiboot boot loader (which are 32-bit), and instead loading
SS with 0. The vmx.flat test failed because KVM did not like doing writes
into such an SS.
Load again the segment registers after entering 64-bit mode, for both
the BSP and the APs.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>
diff --git a/x86/cstart64.S b/x86/cstart64.S
index 8d0d95d..8d5ee2d 100644
--- a/x86/cstart64.S
+++ b/x86/cstart64.S
@@ -213,7 +213,11 @@ idt_descr:
load_tss:
lidtq idt_descr
- mov $0, %eax
+ mov $0x10, %eax
+ mov %ax, %ds
+ mov %ax, %es
+ mov %ax, %fs
+ mov %ax, %gs
mov %ax, %ss
mov $(APIC_DEFAULT_PHYS_BASE + APIC_ID), %eax
mov (%rax), %eax
Paolo, what is the purpose of initializing %gs and %fs ? It seems if I comment
out "mov %ax, %gs", the test works.
handle_irq() does seem to trigger but the handler doesn't seem
to get called if %gs is initialized. Weird.
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
