On Fri, 2015-07-10 at 23:09 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > On 10/07/2015 19:52, Alex Williamson wrote: > > Perhaps if a second consumer comes along that would be justification for > > tying it elsewhere in the build system. ARM will obviously need to do > > similar. Are there better options? > > > > Also, there's no maintainer for the top level virt/ directory. Paolo, > > would you feel comfortable taking this, maybe with some additional acks? > > That's okay; alternatively, we can share it since after all you wrote > most of it. Sure. Actually my wording was confusing, I was actually just suggesting the patch be merged through the KVM tree since I think the consumer code is going to be significantly bulkier than the producer code. I can certainly add a MAINTAINERS entry for virt/lib/ that we can share if you like. Thanks, Alex -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
