Hi Feng, On 07/07/2015 10:47 AM, Wu, Feng wrote: > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Eric Auger [mailto:eric.auger@xxxxxxxxxx] >> Sent: Monday, July 06, 2015 8:12 PM >> To: eric.auger@xxxxxx; eric.auger@xxxxxxxxxx; >> linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; >> kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; christoffer.dall@xxxxxxxxxx; marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx; >> alex.williamson@xxxxxxxxxx; pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx; avi.kivity@xxxxxxxxx; >> mtosatti@xxxxxxxxxx; Wu, Feng; joro@xxxxxxxxxx; >> b.reynal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; patches@xxxxxxxxxx >> Subject: [RFC v2 6/6] KVM: eventfd: add irq bypass consumer management >> >> This patch adds the registration/unregistration of an >> irq_bypass_consumer on irqfd assignment/deassignment. >> >> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@xxxxxxxxxx> >> >> --- >> >> v1 -> v2: >> - populate of kvm and gsi removed >> - unregister the consumer on irqfd_shutdown >> --- >> include/linux/kvm_irqfd.h | 1 + >> virt/kvm/eventfd.c | 14 +++++++++++--- >> 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/include/linux/kvm_irqfd.h b/include/linux/kvm_irqfd.h >> index f926b39..3c0bd07 100644 >> --- a/include/linux/kvm_irqfd.h >> +++ b/include/linux/kvm_irqfd.h >> @@ -64,6 +64,7 @@ struct kvm_kernel_irqfd { >> struct list_head list; >> poll_table pt; >> struct work_struct shutdown; >> + struct irq_bypass_consumer consumer; >> }; >> >> #endif /* __LINUX_KVM_IRQFD_H */ >> diff --git a/virt/kvm/eventfd.c b/virt/kvm/eventfd.c >> index b79dc61..9452754 100644 >> --- a/virt/kvm/eventfd.c >> +++ b/virt/kvm/eventfd.c >> @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ >> #include <linux/srcu.h> >> #include <linux/slab.h> >> #include <linux/seqlock.h> >> +#include <linux/irqbypass.h> >> #include <trace/events/kvm.h> >> >> #include <kvm/iodev.h> >> @@ -140,6 +141,7 @@ irqfd_shutdown(struct work_struct *work) >> /* >> * It is now safe to release the object's resources >> */ >> + irq_bypass_unregister_consumer(&irqfd->consumer); >> eventfd_ctx_put(irqfd->eventfd); >> kfree(irqfd); >> } >> @@ -380,7 +382,14 @@ kvm_irqfd_assign(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_irqfd >> *args) >> */ >> fdput(f); >> >> - /* irq_bypass_register_consumer(); */ >> + irqfd->consumer.token = (void *)irqfd->eventfd; >> + irqfd->consumer.add_producer = kvm_arch_irq_bypass_add_producer; >> + irqfd->consumer.del_producer = kvm_arch_irq_bypass_del_producer; >> + irqfd->consumer.stop = kvm_arch_irq_bypass_stop; >> + irqfd->consumer.resume = kvm_arch_irq_bypass_resume; >> + irqfd->consumer.update = kvm_arch_irq_bypass_update; >> + ret = irq_bypass_register_consumer(&irqfd->consumer); >> + WARN_ON(ret); >> >> return 0; >> >> @@ -481,8 +490,6 @@ kvm_irqfd_deassign(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_irqfd >> *args) >> struct kvm_kernel_irqfd *irqfd, *tmp; >> struct eventfd_ctx *eventfd; >> >> - /* irq_bypass_unregister_consumer() */ >> - >> eventfd = eventfd_ctx_fdget(args->fd); >> if (IS_ERR(eventfd)) >> return PTR_ERR(eventfd); >> @@ -501,6 +508,7 @@ kvm_irqfd_deassign(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_irqfd >> *args) >> irqfd->irq_entry.type = 0; >> write_seqcount_end(&irqfd->irq_entry_sc); >> irqfd_deactivate(irqfd); >> + irq_bypass_unregister_consumer(&irqfd->consumer); > > consumer is unregistered in irqfd_shutdown(), why need we do it here? Yes you're right, this is not needed anymore. Did things too hastily :-( Otherwise does that isolated series fit your needs for posted interrupts and match your expectations with regards to split/reusability? Eric > > Thanks, > Feng > >> } >> } >> >> -- >> 1.9.1 > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
