On 03/07/2015 15:12, Eric Auger wrote: >> > Linux IRQ and active should be okay. As to the vfio_device handle, you >> > should link it from the vfio_platform_device instead. And for the >> > vfio_platform_device, you can link it from the vfio_platform_irq instead. > For this last one, I don't think this is achievable since if I store the > vfio_platform_irq in the opaque, it matches irqs[i] of > vfio_platform_device and I don't have any mean to retrieve "i" when > calling container_of. Right, notice I said "link it": struct vfio_platform_irq *irq = container_of(prod, struct vfio_platform_irq, producer); struct vfio_platform_device *vpdev = irq->vpdev; struct vfio_device *vdev = vpdev->vdev; Would this be okay? Paolo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
