Hi Pavel, On 06/25/2015 10:46 AM, Pavel Fedin wrote: > Hi! > >> But personally I would prefer we >> check irqchip routing entries have flat mapping, ie gsi = irqchip.pin >> since in any case we don't want/expect the userspace to play with that. > > Why? On x86 userspace perfectly can play with it. We can imagine some very new qemu version in > future which has all arch-specific kludges like "direct mapping" removed and relying fully on > routing which it sets up from scratch, in the same way as x86 qemu does this. Or we can imagine some > new, legacy-free hypervisor implementation. The gsi == irqchip.pin limitation is just what we have > now by default, for backwards compatibility. But by design we were never obliged to stick to this. > Well, it's just MHO... OK I will get rid of the test. I think the most important is we clearly state routing doesn't apply to KVM_IRQ_LINE. Thanks Eric > > Kind regards, > Pavel Fedin > Expert Engineer > Samsung Electronics Research center Russia > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
