On 23/06/15 12:51, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 23/06/2015 11:47, Denis V. Lunev wrote:
The current implementation is potentially more flexible but makes the
MSR handling a little more awkward since the host_initiated bool needs
to be passed around (patch 09). I guess either approach seems ok to
me.
Also, if this patchset is used then it looks like
HV_X64_MSR_CRASH_CTL_CONTENTS can be removed.
Paolo,
do you have any opinion on this? I prefer
configurable way but there is no problem
to enable it by default dropping 'hv_panic'
property.
I also prefer the configurable way. Would hv_panic prevent
reboot-on-BSOD from rebooting the VM?
Paolo
the behavior becomes controlled by libvirt, which has
appropriate event configuration, specified here
https://libvirt.org/formatdomain.html
namely
<on_crash>restart</on_crash>
Thus it looks like without libvirt help the guest will stuck
in RUN_STATE_GUEST_PANICKED state.
Den
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
