Re: strange guest slowness after some time

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
Tomasz Chmielewski schrieb:
Avi Kivity schrieb:
packet counters are will within 32-bit limits. byte counters not so interesting.

Ah OK.
I did only byte overflow.

Packet overflow will take much longer. It's one of these very rare cases where setting very small MTU is useful...

OK, another bug found.

Set your MTU to 100.

On two hosts, do:

HOST1_MTU1500# dd if=/dev/zero | ssh manager@HOST2 dd of=/dev/null
HOST2_MTU100# dd if=/dev/zero | ssh manager@HOST1 dd of=/dev/null

HOST2 with MTU 100 will crash after 10-15 minutes (with packet count still not overflown).

Intersting. What are the packet counter at crash time (roughly)?

My - currently running - test is:

Guest 1 (Linux):
MTU 150
# cat /dev/zero | nc <guest2ip> 7777

Guest 2 (Windows 2003 Server):
MTU: 1500
# nc -l -p 7777 > NUL

My packet are currently at 63 million without a problem - yet.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux