Am 01.06.2015 um 11:08 schrieb Christoffer Dall: >>> >>> Second, looking at the ppc and mips code, they seem to also call >>> kvm_guest_exit() before enabling interrupts, so I don't understand how >>> guest CPU time accounting works on those architectures. >> >> Not an expert here, but I assume mips has the same logic as arm so if your >> patch is right for arm its probably also for mips. >> >> powerpc looks similar to what s390 does (not using the tick, instead it uses >> a hw-timer) so this should be fine. >> > I wonder if we can simply enable HAVE_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING_GEN and get > this for free which would avoid the need for this patch? Asssuming that HAVE_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING_GEN behaves similar to HAVE_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING on s390/power in respect to not rely on ticks - yes it might work out. Can you give it a try? Christian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
