On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 01:18:22PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Thu, 14 May 2015 19:31:19 +0200 Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > If the rwsem starves writers it wasn't strictly a bug but lockdep > > doesn't like it and this avoids depending on lowlevel implementation > > details of the lock. > > > > ... > > > > @@ -229,13 +246,33 @@ static __always_inline ssize_t __mcopy_atomic(struct mm_struct *dst_mm, > > > > if (!zeropage) > > err = mcopy_atomic_pte(dst_mm, dst_pmd, dst_vma, > > - dst_addr, src_addr); > > + dst_addr, src_addr, &page); > > else > > err = mfill_zeropage_pte(dst_mm, dst_pmd, dst_vma, > > dst_addr); > > > > cond_resched(); > > > > + if (unlikely(err == -EFAULT)) { > > + void *page_kaddr; > > + > > + BUILD_BUG_ON(zeropage); > > I'm not sure what this is trying to do. BUILD_BUG_ON(local_variable)? > > It goes bang in my build. I'll just delete it. Yes, it has to be a false positive failure, so it's fine to drop it. My gcc 4.8.4 can go inside the static called function and see that only mcopy_atomic_pte can return -EFAULT. RHEL7 (4.8.3) gcc didn't complain either. Perhaps to make the BUILD_BUG_ON work with older gcc, it requrires a local variable set explicitly in the callee, but it's not worth it. It would be bad if we end up in the -EFAULT path in the zeropage case (if somebody later adds an apparently innocent -EFAULT retval and unexpectedly ends up in the mcopy_atomic_pte retry logic), but it's not important, the caller should be reviewed before improvising new retvals anyway. The retry loop addition and the BUILD_BUG_ON is all about the copy_from_user run while we already hold the mmap_sem (potentially of a different process in the non-cooperative case but it's a problem if it's the current task mmap_sem in case the rwlock implementation changes to avoid write starvation and becomes non-reentrant). lockdep definitely complains (even if I think in practice it'd be safe to read-lock recurse, we just got lockdep complains never deadlocks in fact). I didn't want to call gup_fast as copy_from_user is faster and I got an usable user mapping with likely TLB entry hot too. The lockdep warnings we hit I think were associated with NUMA hinting faults or something infrequent like that, the fast path doesn't need to retry. Thanks, Andrea -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html