Re: [RFC PATCH 1/4] KVM: x86: Split the APIC from the rest of IRQCHIP.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>
> BTW, what is the purpose of this series. If I understand it correctly, you only want to
> use the in-kernel lapic and leave the others (pic, ioapic) in userspace, what is the
> benefit of it?

The purpose is to achieve the security benefit of removing some of the
interrupt handling into userspace, without incurring a significant
performance penalty.  If you move the entire IRQCHIP into userspace,
we've seen perf impacts from 15-200% depending on the workload.  With
this patch series, we're seeing perf penalty <1% on our tests (TCP_RR
latency, TCP throughput, and Disk I/O).  See
(https://lwn.net/Articles/619332/)

>
> Thanks,
> Feng
>
>>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux