On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 05:32:53PM +0200, Eric Auger wrote: > On 05/06/2015 04:27 PM, Christoffer Dall wrote: > > Hi Eric, > > > > On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 09:20:53AM +0100, Eric Auger wrote: > >> This series proposes some fixes that appeared to be necessary > >> to integrate IRQ forwarding in KVM/VFIO. > >> > >> - deactivation of the forwarded IRQ in irq_disabled case > >> - a specific handling of forwarded IRQ into the VGIC state machine. > >> - deactivation of physical IRQ and unforwarding on vgic destruction > >> - rb_tree lock in vgic.c > >> > >> Integrated pieces can be found at > >> ssh://git.linaro.org/people/eric.auger/linux.git > >> on branch irqfd_integ_v9 > >> > > What are the dependencies for this at this point? > > > > I assume it relies at least on the split EOI/priority drop changes? > > Yes it now only depends on split EOI/priority drop changes since > "genirq: Saving/restoring the irqchip state of an irq line" now is > upstreamed. > > > > > Are you going to respin this when there are newer versions of the > > dependencies out, or what are the plans? > > Yes I will respin according to new versions. I am currently using a > rebased version of Marc's original RFC "ARM: Forwarding physical > interrupts to a guest VM" (http://lwn.net/Articles/603514/) which is a > superset of [PATCH] genirq: Add support for priority-drop/deactivate > interrupt controllers. > ok, once there's movement on the dependency and you respin, I'll review the rest of this in detail. -Christoffer -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
