Am 13.04.2015 um 15:56 schrieb Michael Mueller:
[...]
> +static int cpu_model_get(KVMState *s, uint64_t attr, uint64_t addr)
> +{
> + int rc = -ENOSYS;
> + struct kvm_device_attr dev_attr = {
> + .group = KVM_S390_VM_CPU_MODEL,
> + .attr = attr,
> + .addr = addr,
Would it make sense to do the cast here....
> + };
> +
> + if (kvm_vm_check_attr(s, dev_attr.group, dev_attr.attr)) {
> + rc = kvm_vm_ioctl(s, KVM_GET_DEVICE_ATTR, &dev_attr);
> + }
> +
> + return rc;
> +}
> +
> +static int cpu_model_set(KVMState *s, uint64_t attr, uint64_t addr)
> +{
> + int rc = -ENOSYS;
> + struct kvm_device_attr dev_attr = {
> + .group = KVM_S390_VM_CPU_MODEL,
> + .attr = attr,
> + .addr = addr,
...and here...
> + };
> +
> + if (kvm_vm_check_attr(s, dev_attr.group, dev_attr.attr)) {
> + rc = kvm_vm_ioctl(s, KVM_SET_DEVICE_ATTR, &dev_attr);
> + }
> +
> + return rc;
> +}
> +
> +static int kvm_s390_get_machine_props(KVMState *s, S390MachineProps *prop)
> +{
> + int rc = -EFAULT;
> +
> + if (s) {
> + rc = cpu_model_get(s, KVM_S390_VM_CPU_MACHINE, (uint64_t) prop);
and pass S390MachineProps as 3rd parameter?
> +int kvm_s390_get_processor_props(S390ProcessorProps *prop)
> +{
> + int rc;
> +
> + rc = cpu_model_get(kvm_state, KVM_S390_VM_CPU_PROCESSOR, (uint64_t) prop);
dito
> + trace_kvm_get_processor_props(rc, prop->cpuid, prop->ibc);
> + return rc;
> +}
> +
> +int kvm_s390_set_processor_props(S390ProcessorProps *prop)
> +{
> + int rc;
> +
> + rc = cpu_model_set(kvm_state, KVM_S390_VM_CPU_PROCESSOR, (uint64_t) prop);
dito
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
