On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 04:07:56PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 21/04/2015 16:07, Catalin Vasile wrote: > > I don't get the part with getting cryptodev upstream. > > I don't know what getting cryptodev upstream actually implies. > > From what I know cryptodev is done (is a functional project) that was > > rejected in the Linux Kernel > > and there isn't actually way to get it upstream. > > Yes, I agree. The limitations of AF_ALG need to addressed somehow, so what is the next step? Stefan
Attachment:
pgpMCRmRwUXn4.pgp
Description: PGP signature
