Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] KVM: x86: INIT and reset sequences are different

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 07/04/2015 18:17, Bandan Das wrote:
> > I think a bool argument is good enough.  QEMU has different functions,
> > and init ends up doing save/reset/restore which is pretty ugly.
> 
> Right, I meant that init could just be a wrapper so that it atleast shows up in
> a backtrace - could be helpful for debugging.

I suspect that the compiler would inline any sensible implementation and
it wouldn't show up in the backtraces. :(

Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux