Re: [PATCH v5 3/6] hw/intc: arm_gic_kvm.c restore config first

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 23 March 2015 at 17:05, Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> As there is logic to deal with the difference between edge and level
> triggered interrupts in the kernel we must ensure it knows the
> configuration of the IRQs before we restore the pending state.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> diff --git a/hw/intc/arm_gic_kvm.c b/hw/intc/arm_gic_kvm.c
> index 0d20750..e2512f1 100644
> --- a/hw/intc/arm_gic_kvm.c
> +++ b/hw/intc/arm_gic_kvm.c
> @@ -370,6 +370,11 @@ static void kvm_arm_gic_put(GICState *s)
>       * the appropriate CPU interfaces in the kernel) */
>      kvm_dist_put(s, 0x800, 8, s->num_irq, translate_targets);
>
> +    /* irq_state[n].trigger -> GICD_ICFGRn
> +     * (restore targets before pending IRQs so we treat level/edge
> +     * correctly */
> +    kvm_dist_put(s, 0xc00, 2, s->num_irq, translate_trigger);

You don't seem to have acted on Christoffer's query in v4
about this comment...

-- PMM
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux