On Sun, Mar 08, 2009 at 11:12:47AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote: > Avi Kivity wrote: > > > >In this case, the branch ought to be called stable_0_10, no? > > That's not a bad idea if everyone agrees that 0.10.1 is good stable > naming convention. I was hoping to have the first stable release about > 2 weeks after the 0.10.0 release FWIW. There's already some good stuff > in the stable tree. I think 0.10.1 makes perfect sense for next stable release name. Regards, Daniel -- |: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o- http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org -o- http://ovirt.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :| -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
