RE: [Qemu-devel] ANNOUNCE: QEMU 0.10.0 stable branch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I just wonder if 0.XX is a good name for a stable release. May is suggest to increase the major number (1.XX). 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: kvm-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:kvm-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of Anthony Liguori
> Sent: Sonntag, 08. März 2009 17:13
> To: Avi Kivity
> Cc: qemu-devel@xxxxxxxxxx; kvm-devel
> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] ANNOUNCE: QEMU 0.10.0 stable branch
> 
> Avi Kivity wrote:
> >
> > In this case, the branch ought to be called stable_0_10, no?
> 
> That's not a bad idea if everyone agrees that 0.10.1 is good stable
> naming convention.  I was hoping to have the first stable release about
> 2 weeks after the 0.10.0 release FWIW.  There's already some good stuff
> in the stable tree.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux