Re: regression: nested: L1 3.15+ fails to load kvm-intel on L0 <3.15

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 18.03.2015 11:27, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> 
> 
> On 18/03/2015 10:59, Stefan Bader wrote:
>>> @@ -2850,7 +2851,7 @@ static __init int setup_vmcs_config(struct
>>> vmcs_config *vmcs_conf) vmx_capability.ept,
>>> vmx_capability.vpid); }
>>>
>>> -	min = 0; +	min = VM_EXIT_SAVE_DEBUG_CONTROLS; #ifdef
>>> CONFIG_X86_64 min |= VM_EXIT_HOST_ADDR_SPACE_SIZE; #endif
>>>
>>> but I don't think it's a good idea to add it to stable kernels.
>>
>> Why is that? Because it has a risk of causing the module failing to
>> load on L0 where it did work before?
> 
> Because if we wanted to make 3.14 nested VMX stable-ish we would need
> several more, at least these:
> 
>       KVM: nVMX: fix lifetime issues for vmcs02
>       KVM: nVMX: clean up nested_release_vmcs12 and code around it
>       KVM: nVMX: Rework interception of IRQs and NMIs
>       KVM: nVMX: Do not inject NMI vmexits when L2 has a pending
>                  interrupt
>       KVM: nVMX: Disable preemption while reading from shadow VMCS
> 
> and for 3.13:
> 
>       KVM: nVMX: Leave VMX mode on clearing of feature control MSR
> 
> There are also several L2-crash-L1 bugs too in Nadav Amit's patches.
> 
> Basically, nested VMX was never considered stable-worthy.  Perhaps
> that can change soon---but not retroactively.
> 
> So I'd rather avoid giving false impressions of the stability of nVMX
> in 3.14.
> 
> Even if we considered nVMX stable, I'd _really_ not want to consider
> the L1<->L2 boundary a secure one for a longer time.
> 
>> Which would be something I would rather avoid. Generally I think it
>> would be good to have something that can be generally applied.
>> Given the speed that cloud service providers tend to move forward
>> (ok they may not actively push the ability to go nested).
> 
> And if they did, I'd really not want them to do it with a 3.14 kernel.

3.14... you are optimistic. :) But thanks a lot for the detailed info.

-Stefan

> 
> Paolo
> 


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux