On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 02:54:44PM +0800, Yu Zhao wrote:
> +static inline void virtfn_bdf(struct pci_dev *dev, int id, u8 *busnr, u8 *devfn)
> +{
> + u16 bdf;
> +
> + bdf = (dev->bus->number << 8) + dev->devfn +
> + dev->sriov->offset + dev->sriov->stride * id;
> + *busnr = bdf >> 8;
> + *devfn = bdf & 0xff;
> +}
I find the interface here a bit clunky -- a function returning void
while having two OUT parameters. How about this variation on the theme
(viewers are encouraged to come up with their own preferred
implementations and interfaces):
static inline __pure u16 virtfn_bdf(struct pci_dev *dev, int id)
{
return (dev->bus->number << 8) + dev->devfn + dev->sriov->offset +
dev->sriov->stride * id;
}
#define VIRT_BUS(dev, id) (virtfn_bdf(dev, id) >> 8)
#define VIRT_DEVFN(dev, id) (virtfn_bdf(dev, id) & 0xff)
We rely on GCC to do CSE and not actually invoke virtfn_bdf more than
once.
--
Matthew Wilcox Intel Open Source Technology Centre
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
