On Mon, 2 Mar 2015 16:11:00 -0300 Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 01:44:06PM +0100, Michael Mueller wrote: > > This patch implements the QMP command 'query-cpu-definitions' in the S390 > > context. The command returns a list of cpu model names in the current host > > context. A consumer may successfully request each listed cpu model as long > > for a given accelerator this model is runnable. > > > > The QMP type AccelCpuModelInfo is introduced and the type CpuDefinitionInfo > > is extended by the optional field 'accelerators'. It contains a list of named > > accelerators and some indication whether the associated cpu model is runnable > > or the default cpu model. The default cpu model is used if either no specific > > cpu model is requested during QEMU startup or if the cpu model with name > > 'host' is requested. > > > > request: > > {"execute": "query-cpu-definitions"} > > > > answer: > > {"return": > > [{"name":"2964-ga1","accelerators":[{"name":"kvm","runnable":false,"default":false}]}, > > {"name":"2828-ga1","accelerators":[{"name":"kvm","runnable":false,"default":false}]}, > > {"name":"2827-ga2","accelerators":[{"name":"kvm","runnable":true,"default":true}]}, > > {"name":"2827-ga1","accelerators":[{"name":"kvm","runnable":true,"default":false}]}, > > {"name":"2818-ga1","accelerators":[{"name":"kvm","runnable":true,"default":false}]}, > > ... > > {"name":"2064-ga1","accelerators":[{"runnable":true,"name":"kvm","default":false}]} > > ] > > } > > On x86, being runnable or not is something that depends on the > machine-type. I expect that to happen in other machines as soon as they > start implementing backwards compatiblity. > > I see two options to implement that: 1) adding a "machine-type" argument > to query-cpu-definitions; 2) returning a machine-type-based dictionary > on the "runnable" property. The former sounds better to me as it won't > require enumerating all machine-types every time. > > In that case, why we do need to enumerate all accelerators on every > query, either? We could have both "machine-type" and "accel" arguments > to query-cpu-definitions, so callers will just ask for the > acceleratores/machine-types they are interested into. > > e.g.: > > request: > {"execute": "query-cpu-definitions", > "arguments": {"machine":"s390-virtio", "accel":"kvm"}} > > answer: > {"return": > [{"name":"2964-ga1","runnable":true}, > {"name":"2828-ga1","runnable":false} > ... > ] > } I had some discussion with out libvirt people on that. I will compile a patch implementing this to see how it fits.. > > We can also extend this to other variables, such as extra CPU flags that > could make the CPU runnable or not. e.g.: want to know if "-machine > foo,accel=bar -cpu xxx,+yyy,-zzz" is runnable? Send this request: > {"execute": "query-cpu-definitions", > "arguments": {"machine":"s390-virtio", "accel":"kvm", "cpu":"xxx,+yyy,-zzz"}} > and get this response: > {"return": [{"name":"xxx","runnable":false}]} > or maybe being more explicit in the response about the extra CPU flags: > {"return": [{"name":"xxx,+yyy,-zzz","runnable":false}]} > > > > {"execute": "query-cpu-definitions"} > > > > answer: > > {"return": > > [{"name":"2964-ga1","accelerators":[{"name":"kvm","runnable":false,"default":false}]}, > > {"name":"2828-ga1","accelerators":[{"name":"kvm","runnable":false,"default":false}]}, > > {"name":"2827-ga2","accelerators":[{"name":"kvm","runnable":true,"default":true}]}, > > {"name":"2827-ga1","accelerators":[{"name":"kvm","runnable":true,"default":false}]}, > > {"name":"2818-ga1","accelerators":[{"name":"kvm","runnable":true,"default":false}]}, > > > > Signed-off-by: Michael Mueller <mimu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > [...] > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html