2015-03-01 21:29-0500, Bandan Das:
> Joel Schopp <joel.schopp@xxxxxxx> writes:
>
> > From: David Kaplan <David.Kaplan@xxxxxxx>
> > No need to re-decode WBINVD since we know what it is from the intercept.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: David Kaplan <David.Kaplan@xxxxxxx>
> > [extracted from larger unlrelated patch, forward ported, tested]
> > Signed-off-by: Joel Schopp <joel.schopp@xxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
> > +static int wbinvd_interception(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
> > +{
> > + kvm_emulate_wbinvd(&svm->vcpu);
> > + skip_emulated_instruction(&svm->vcpu);
> > + return 1;
> > +}
> > +
> > +
> Can't we merge this to kvm_emulate_wbinvd, and just call that function
> directly for both vmx and svm ?
kvm_emulate_wbinvd() lives in x86.c and skip_emulated_instruction() is
from svm.c/vmx.c: so we'd have to create a new x86 op and change the
emulator code as well ... it's probably better like this.
> > static int xsetbv_interception(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
> > {
> > u64 new_bv = kvm_read_edx_eax(&svm->vcpu);
> > @@ -3376,7 +3384,7 @@ static int (*const svm_exit_handlers[])(struct vcpu_svm *svm) = {
> > [SVM_EXIT_STGI] = stgi_interception,
> > [SVM_EXIT_CLGI] = clgi_interception,
> > [SVM_EXIT_SKINIT] = skinit_interception,
> > - [SVM_EXIT_WBINVD] = emulate_on_interception,
> So, this means x86_emulate_insn() in emulate.c has no callers left for the
> wbinvd case ? vmx calls kvm_emulate_wbinvd directly too..
I think that invalid state emulation might still hit wbinvd.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
