Re: [PATCH] Revert "target-ppc: Create versionless CPU class per family if KVM"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 02.03.15 14:42, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 02.03.2015 um 14:37 schrieb Alexander Graf:
>> On 01.03.15 01:31, Andreas Färber wrote:
>>> This reverts commit 5b79b1cadd3e565b6d1a5ba59764bd47af58b271 to avoid
>>> double-registration of types:
>>>
>>>   Registering `POWER5+-powerpc64-cpu' which already exists
>>>
>>> Taking the textual description of a CPU type as part of a new type name
>>> is plain wrong, and so is unconditionally registering a new type here.
>>>
>>> Cc: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> Cc: qemu-stable@xxxxxxxxxx
>>> Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber <afaerber@xxxxxxx>
>>
>> Doesn't this break p8 support?
> 
> Maybe, but p5 support was in longer and this is definitely a regression
> and really really wrong. If you know a way to fix it without handing it
> back to the IBM guys for more thought, feel free to give it a shot.

I honestly don't fully remember what this was about. Wasn't this our
special KVM class that we use to create a compatible cpu type on the fly?

Alexey, please take a look at it.


Alex

> 
> Andreas
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux