On 05/02/2015 20:23, Rik van Riel wrote: >> > 3) long term anyway we want it to auto tune, which is better than tuning >> > it per-VM. > We may want to auto tune it per VM. We may even want to auto tune it per VCPU. > However, if we make auto tuning work well, I do not > think we want to expose a user visible tunable per > VM, and commit to keeping that kind of interface > around forever. Exactly. We probably want module parameters to tune the minimum/maximum values (which includes the special cases of disabling polling altogether, and disabling the autotuning while leaving polling enabled), but committing to a per-VM interface is premature. Paolo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
