Re: kvm-83 write performance raw

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 16:22, Anthony Liguori <anthony@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Malinka Rellikwodahs wrote:
>>>>
>>>> What version of kvm is this?  Is it kvm-68?  You'll have better luck
>>>> with
>>>> something newer than that.
>>>>
>>
>> kvm-83 is the one with the problem, kvm-68 is working correctly.
>>
>
> kvm-68 and qcow2 both use cache=writeback by default which is less safe than
> cache=writethrough which is now the default.
>
> But performance shouldn't be as bad as your seeing.

Running the kvm-84 install on the qcow image as kvm -m 1024 -drive
file=qcow,boot=on,cache=writethrough, I get similar performance to the
raw performance.

So it looks like with cache set to writethrough there's a big
performance hit on this setup, any ideas where to look for that?

> Regards,
>
> Anthony Liguori
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux