Hi Al,
On Mon, 2015-02-02 at 07:59 +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> From: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> it has just verified that it asks no more than the length of the
> first segment of iovec.
>
> And with that the last user of stuff in lib/iovec.c is gone.
> RIP.
>
> Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Nicholas A. Bellinger <nab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/vhost/scsi.c | 2 +-
> include/linux/uio.h | 2 --
> lib/Makefile | 2 +-
> lib/iovec.c | 36 ------------------------------------
> 4 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
> delete mode 100644 lib/iovec.c
>
> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/scsi.c b/drivers/vhost/scsi.c
> index d695b16..dc78d87 100644
> --- a/drivers/vhost/scsi.c
> +++ b/drivers/vhost/scsi.c
> @@ -1079,7 +1079,7 @@ vhost_scsi_handle_vq(struct vhost_scsi *vs, struct vhost_virtqueue *vq)
> req_size, vq->iov[0].iov_len);
> break;
> }
> - ret = memcpy_fromiovecend(req, &vq->iov[0], 0, req_size);
> + ret = copy_from_user(req, vq->iov[0].iov_base, req_size);
> if (unlikely(ret)) {
> vq_err(vq, "Faulted on virtio_scsi_cmd_req\n");
> break;
Is this in for-next yet..?
If not, please push out ASAP so SFR can hit the conflict between
target-pending/for-next as a heads up for Linus..
--nab
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
