On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 07:36:14PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > On 12/01/2015 18:19, Christoffer Dall wrote: > >> > Hmm, that's a bit ugly. I'll apply the patches directly too, please do > >> > a "git reset --hard kvm/master" before applying more stuff. > >> > > > ok, we did try to (and say publicly) that we'd keep kvmarm/master a > > stable branch (like it also says about kvm/master on the KVM wiki), so > > that's why I did this. > > > > I guess we can just require people that follow kvmarm/master (if any) to > > deal with things accordingly. > > Yeah, I agree that this shouldn't have happened. > > It's not the end of the world. People that pull from kvmarm/master will > almost always rebase their trees, and the rebase will discard the > duplicate patches. > > The big problem with rebasing happens if you _drop_ patches. In that > case, whoever rebases will keep the patch that you dropped, and most > likely will not notice. > That's a good point. And I don't think anyone directly integrates the kvmarm/master branch into anything anyway. I will reset the branch. Thanks, -Christoffer -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html