2015-01-09 15:56+0100, Paolo Bonzini: > > > On 09/01/2015 15:54, Radim Krčmář wrote: > > There are two points relevant to this patch in new KVM's implementation, > > ("KVM: x86: amend APIC lowest priority arbitration", > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/1/9/362) > > > > 1) lowest priority depends on TPR > > 2) there is no need for balancing > > > > (1) has to be considered with PI as well. > > The chipset doesn't support it. :( I meant that we need to recompute PI entries for lowest priority interrupts every time guest's TPR changes. Luckily, Linux doesn't use TPR, but other OS might be a reason to drop lowest priority from PI optimizations. (Or make it more complicated.) > > I kept (2) to avoid whining from people building on that behaviour, but > > lowest priority backed by PI could be transparent without it. > > > > Patch below removes the balancing, but I am not sure this is a price we > > allowed ourselves to pay ... what are your opinions? > > I wouldn't mind, but it requires a lot of benchmarking. (I was afraid it would come to that.) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html